<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3.0 Beta 4 Vs Opera 9.50 Beta Vs Safari 3.1 Beta &#124; Multiple Sites Opening Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebrowserworld.com/2008/03/29/firefox-30-beta-4-vs-opera-950-beta-vs-safari-31-beta-multiple-sites-opening-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebrowserworld.com/2008/03/29/firefox-30-beta-4-vs-opera-950-beta-vs-safari-31-beta-multiple-sites-opening-test/</link>
	<description>News About Browser's</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: baris</title>
		<link>http://www.thebrowserworld.com/2008/03/29/firefox-30-beta-4-vs-opera-950-beta-vs-safari-31-beta-multiple-sites-opening-test/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>baris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebrowserworld.com/2008/03/29/firefox-30-beta-4-vs-opera-950-beta-vs-safari-31-beta-multiple-sites-opening-test/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>:P opera more faster than firefox. only this blog saying opera slower in the internet world :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.thebrowserworld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> opera more faster than firefox. only this blog saying opera slower in the internet world <img src='http://www.thebrowserworld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ca1</title>
		<link>http://www.thebrowserworld.com/2008/03/29/firefox-30-beta-4-vs-opera-950-beta-vs-safari-31-beta-multiple-sites-opening-test/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>ca1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebrowserworld.com/2008/03/29/firefox-30-beta-4-vs-opera-950-beta-vs-safari-31-beta-multiple-sites-opening-test/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>how exactly you measured the total time for i seem not to find such "open-in-all-tabs" in non-firefox browser.
how many times you repeated the test?

have you made sure *no* browser visited pages *before* - no form of such caching?
and if so what was the again opening effect?

FF being best;) -&#62; in case of opera being slower i may see some sophisticated way of managing memory so none is wasted ;)

lastly what is your favourite web browser and why :) ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how exactly you measured the total time for i seem not to find such &#8220;open-in-all-tabs&#8221; in non-firefox browser.<br />
how many times you repeated the test?</p>
<p>have you made sure *no* browser visited pages *before* - no form of such caching?<br />
and if so what was the again opening effect?</p>
<p>FF being best;) -&gt; in case of opera being slower i may see some sophisticated way of managing memory so none is wasted <img src='http://www.thebrowserworld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>lastly what is your favourite web browser and why <img src='http://www.thebrowserworld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blum</title>
		<link>http://www.thebrowserworld.com/2008/03/29/firefox-30-beta-4-vs-opera-950-beta-vs-safari-31-beta-multiple-sites-opening-test/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Blum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 07:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebrowserworld.com/2008/03/29/firefox-30-beta-4-vs-opera-950-beta-vs-safari-31-beta-multiple-sites-opening-test/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Is this a realistic test? The only times I load that many(and that big) pages is when my browser crashes which happens relatively seldom. Wouldn't a more realstic test be: I have a lot of stuff open and I open one more large site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this a realistic test? The only times I load that many(and that big) pages is when my browser crashes which happens relatively seldom. Wouldn&#8217;t a more realstic test be: I have a lot of stuff open and I open one more large site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.thebrowserworld.com/2008/03/29/firefox-30-beta-4-vs-opera-950-beta-vs-safari-31-beta-multiple-sites-opening-test/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebrowserworld.com/2008/03/29/firefox-30-beta-4-vs-opera-950-beta-vs-safari-31-beta-multiple-sites-opening-test/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>W00t? Safari doesn't show it's father's website right...?
But nevertheless, Firefox rocks ^^ And another thing, where can I see the Acid3 results?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>W00t? Safari doesn&#8217;t show it&#8217;s father&#8217;s website right&#8230;?<br />
But nevertheless, Firefox rocks ^^ And another thing, where can I see the Acid3 results?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  stristr() [<a href='function.stristr'>function.stristr</a>]: Empty delimiter in <b>/home/tbw/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wassup/wassup.php</b> on line <b>2093</b><br />
